Skip to content

The Razor’s Edge: The Fate of Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement

Conversations on Race, Ideology & Reform

Wednesday May 05, 2021 | Original Broadcast

Cognizant of the powerful forces shaping public discourse, the Thomson Reuters Institute is pleased to produce an ongoing thought leadership spotlight on race relations, ideological division, and law enforcement reform during a seminal moment in modern society. Our aim is to bring together perspectives from key influencers and power brokers across academic, practitioner, and regulatory quarters for a series of cordial and earnest dialogues around social upheaval and transformation.

Recent events have cast a national spotlight on qualified immunity and law enforcement. Across the political spectrum, perspectives on the justification for or argument against qualified immunity continue to foster debate, with elected officials at both a national and municipal level weighing controversial legislation to hold law enforcement personnel more accountable than ever. This conversation offers a nuanced look at the fate of qualified immunity today. On the heels of the recent United States Supreme Court opinions (Zadeh v. Robinson, Corbitt v. Vickers, and Baxter v. Bracey) that acknowledge clear constitutional violations at the hands of law enforcement personnel but stop well short of reconsidering qualified immunity altogether, will the rising tide of legislative scrutiny ultimately sink or buoy qualified immunity as we know it?

On-Demand Recording Now Available  |   $24.99 USD 

On-demand access expires 365 days from date of purchase.

Event Details

Remote

$24.99

For questions about this event, please call 1-800-308-1700 or email us at tri@thomsonreuters.com

Why You Should Attend

  • As one of the world’s most ethical companies, Thomson Reuters considers it an honor and privilege to host this timely and earnest dialogue on sociopolitical change
  • Our panel offers a comprehensive take on qualified immunity with insights both for and against calls for reform
  • Participants are invited to submit questions and engage our presenters throughout the conversation

Who Should Attend

  • Law enforcement professionals
  • Diversity & Inclusion professionals, allies and advocates
  • Community leaders
  • Social justice advocates and allies

Chair(s) and Faculty

Chair(s) Faculty
Axel Threlfall
Editor at Large, Reuters
Andrew Chung
Correspondent, U.S. Supreme Court, Reuters
Hugh M. Mo, Esq.
Chairman, Asian-American Police Executives Council
Mahogane Reed
John Payton Appellate & Supreme Court Advocacy Fellow, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Jay Schweikert
Policy Analyst, Cato Institute

More Information

Agenda

Venue

Sponsors

Downloads

Event agenda

(all times local)

Wednesday May 05, 2021

12:00 PM ET The Razor’s Edge: The Fate of Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement

Recent events have cast a national spotlight on qualified immunity and law enforcement. Across the political spectrum, perspectives on the justification for or argument against qualified immunity continue to foster debate, with elected officials at both a national and municipal level weighing controversial legislation to hold law enforcement personnel more accountable than ever. This conversation offers a nuanced look at the fate of qualified immunity today. On the heels of the recent United States Supreme Court opinions (Zadeh v. Robinson, Corbitt v. Vickers, and Baxter v. Bracey) that acknowledge clear constitutional violations at the hands of law enforcement personnel but stop well short of reconsidering qualified immunity altogether, will the rising tide of legislative scrutiny ultimately sink or buoy qualified immunity as we know it?

Moderator:
Axel Threlfall, Editor at Large, Reuters

Panelists:
Andrew Chung, Correspondent, U.S. Supreme Court, Reuters
Hugh H. Mo, Esq., Chairman, Asian-American Police Executives Council; Founder, The Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C.; Former Deputy Commissioner of Trials, New York Police Department (1984-1988)
Mahogane Reed, John Payton Appellate & Supreme Court Advocacy Fellow, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Jay Schweikert, Policy Analyst, Project on Criminal Justice, Cato Institute

1:15 PM ET Conclusion

Sponsors